독일 일반 면세 구매대행
임시 중단 안내
안녕하세요. 오마이집입니다.
더 나은 서비스를 위해
독일 일반 면세 구매대행 서비스를 임시 중단합니다.
새로운 모습으로 빠른 시일 내 다시 인사드리겠습니다.
감사합니다.
US
DE
498 Centerpoint Blvd
[사서함번호]
New Castle, DE, 19720
302-322-8792
* 항공운송만 가능
US
CA
2601 Walnut Ave
[사서함번호]
Tustin, CA, 92780
714-676-7274
* 해상운송만 가능
China
山东省威海市 环翠区 苘山镇
福州路9号 顺丰速递北20米
[사서함번호]
264414
156-8451-3564
* 항공&해상운송 가능
Germany
WarpEx [사서함번호]
Carl-Benz Str. 35
Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Deutschland
60386
0614-2482-9236
* 항공운송만 가능
Korea
서울시 강서구 마곡중앙6로 11 보타닉파크타워3 405호
[사서함번호]
07801
070-5228-2983
Japan
福岡県 福岡市東区
和白東1丁目16-15 HANIRO
[사서함번호]
811-0214
092-608-7642
* 해상운송만 가능
고객센터 알림
NO | 안내시간 | 수취인명 | 신청서번호 | 알림내용 |
---|
* 알림 내용을 클릭하면 해당 페이지로 이동합니다.
Delaware
$19.99
책 정보
출판사 | Intra S.R.L.S. |
---|---|
저자 | Gianluca Sposito |
판형 | Paperback |
ISBN-13 | 9791280035059 |
발행일 | 2020/10/14 |
언어 | eng |
무게 (LB) | 0.3 |
주제 분류
책 소개
A practical aid that will allow the reader to understand classical rhetoric whilst focusing on the needs of modern jurists.
Effective forensic communication cannot be achieved in an extemporaneous fashion or without preliminary preparation: communication has to be shaped by studying rhetoric, psychology and paraverbal and non-verbal communication. Knowing and being able to use rhetoric allows you to organize your thinking in a technically valid way and deliver persuasive speech. This book represents a practical aid that will allow the reader to understand classical rhetoric whilst focusing on the needs of modern jurists. Gianluca Sposito (1973) is an Italian lawyer and scholar. He has been teaching "Legal Argumentation and Forensic Rhetoric" at the University of Urbino since 2004. He is one of Italy's leading experts on rhetoric and communication. SUMMARY Introduction - 1. The pillars of forensic eloquence. The role of classical rhetoric - "Regulated" eloquence. Organization of the speech. Lógos, páthos and êthos - The parts of persuasive speech - The introductory part (exordium) - Presentation of the facts (narratio) - Argumentation (argumentatio) - The epilogue (peroratio) - Organization of the arguments (dispositio) - The linguistic and expressive form (elocutio). The virtues of verbal expression (virtutes elocutionis) - The rhetorical skills of the forensic speaker - 2. Rhetorical figures and schemes - 2.1. Rhetorical figures and classification systems - 2.2. Classification by speaker's goals - 2.3. To accentuate - Emphasis - Hyperbole - 2.4. To allude - Allusion - 2.5. To attenuate - Litotes - Euphemism - 2.6. To compare - Comparison - Simile - 2.7. To oppose - Antithesis - Oxymoron - 2.8. To create - Metaphor - Metonymy - Synecdoche - Periphrasis - Antonomasia - Synesthesia - 2.9. To digress - Digression - Parenthesis - Prosapodosis or subnexio - 2.10. To query - Dubitatio - Sermocinatio - Percontatio - 2.11. To dramatize - Apostrophe - Exclamation - 2.12. To mask - Simulation and dissimulation - Antiphrasis - Irony and sarcasm - 2.13. To order - Anastrophe and hyperbaton - Epiphrase - Hysteron proteron - 2.14. To repeat - Anaphora - Polysyndeton 2.14.3. Epiphora - Symploce - Polyptoton - Epanalepsis - Epizeuxis - Anadiplosis - Climax - Alliteration - Homeoteleuton - 2.15. To sentence - Sententia - Maxim - Aphorism - Proverb - 2.16. To subtract - Brachyology, conciseness or brevitas - Percursio - Ellipse - Preterition - Aposiopesis or reticence - Asyndeton - 2.17. To explain - Commoratio - Expolitio - Interpretatio - Definition - Epanorthosis or correctio - 3. Argumentative fallacies - 3.1. Introduction and definition - 3.2. A good argument. Classification of fallacies - 3.3. Semantic fallacies - Lexical ambiguity. Fallacy of the fourth term - Structural ambiguity. Amphiboly. Fallacy of accent- Vagueness. The paradox of Sorites - 3.4. Emotional fallacies - Argumentum ad baculum (appeal to force) - Argumentum ad metum (appeal to fear) - Argumentum ad misericordiam (appeal to pity) - Argumentum ad hominem - Poisoning the Well - Argumentum ad populum (appeal to common belief) - 3.5. Other relevant fallacies - Argumentum ad verecundiam (appeal to authority) - Argumentum ad ignorantiam (appeal to ignorance) - Red herring (irrelevant conclusion) - Straw man fallacy - Plurium interrogationum (complex question) - Argumentum ad consequentiam (appeal to consequences of a belief) - Petitio principii (circular logic) - Secundum quid (hasty generalization) - False precision (over precision or fake precision) - 4. Visual rhetoric - 4.1. The visual - support and topic - 4.2. Visual rhetorical tools in the American criminal trial - 4.3. Visual rhetorical devices in the Italian criminal trial - 4.4. Limitations and problems of visual rhetoric. Concluding remarks
트래킹 도착 조회
조회
조회 결과가 없는 경우, 센터로 상품이 도착하지 않은 것이니 판매처로 문의해주시기 바랍니다.
배송신청서에 이미 입고처리가 된 건이나 미작성 입고로 안내된 건은 조회가 되지 않습니다.