독일 일반 면세 구매대행
임시 중단 안내
안녕하세요. 오마이집입니다.
더 나은 서비스를 위해
독일 일반 면세 구매대행 서비스를 임시 중단합니다.
새로운 모습으로 빠른 시일 내 다시 인사드리겠습니다.
감사합니다.
US
DE
498 Centerpoint Blvd
[사서함번호]
New Castle, DE, 19720
302-322-8792
* 항공운송만 가능
US
CA
2601 Walnut Ave
[사서함번호]
Tustin, CA, 92780
714-676-7274
* 해상운송만 가능
China
山东省威海市 环翠区 苘山镇
福州路9号 顺丰速递北20米
[사서함번호]
264414
156-8451-3564
* 항공&해상운송 가능
Germany
WarpEx [사서함번호]
Carl-Benz Str. 35
Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Deutschland
60386
0614-2482-9236
* 항공운송만 가능
Korea
서울시 강서구 마곡중앙6로 11 보타닉파크타워3 405호
[사서함번호]
07801
070-5228-2983
Japan
福岡県 福岡市東区
和白東1丁目16-15 HANIRO
[사서함번호]
811-0214
092-608-7642
* 해상운송만 가능
고객센터 알림
NO | 안내시간 | 수취인명 | 신청서번호 | 알림내용 |
---|
* 알림 내용을 클릭하면 해당 페이지로 이동합니다.
Delaware
$5.50
책 정보
출판사 | Lies and Big Feet |
---|---|
저자 | Windows a Feminist Research Ce |
판형 | Paperback |
ISBN-10 | 9384281131 |
ISBN-13 | 9789384281137 |
발행일 | 2016/05/03 |
언어 | eng |
무게 (LB) | 0.22 |
주제 분류
책 소개
It is one thing when religious institutions talk about God and the Supreme Being and the Hindu shastras, and it is also another thing when these institutions also throw in a lot of theology which is outright misogynous and sexist and caste-ist, and thereby exclude half the population of India. Are religious institutions participants in propounding sexist and caste-ist theology which affects how people engage in their every-day lives? Do these institutions therefore, violate the Fundamental Rights that are granted to all the citizens of India by the Constitution?If caste-ist and sex-ist discourse is allowed to function in the public realm, it tantamounts to being unconstitutional and comprises a violation of one of the Fundamental Rights that has been granted in India, namely, Article15 of the Constitution of India and is the Right to Equality.15. Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.-(1) The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them. The larger question which we should all strive towards is: why should the Hindu shastras be seen as comprising, in its totality, "revealed knowledge" when large chunks of it refer to temporal behavior that is based on one's gender or caste (the most oft-cited being Manusmriti's Varnashrama). Why are they cited as being infallible when often these texts propound extremely sexist and caste-ist views?The yet unresolved conundrum, thus is: how does the Indian state (which is also a signatory to CEDAW) allow these texts to be a part of public discourse as they are often, and mostly, quite unconstitutional? The rampant sexist and caste-ist discourse that is intrinsic to our Hindu shastras is overt and unapologetic.How we, that is, women - eat, breathe, dress and conduct ourselves and the kinds of labor that we are allowed to perform - are codified and seen as intrinsic to the Hindu shastras. The realm of religion, indeed, is the privilege of men. And indeed, it would not be salacious to argue that self-identifying Brahmin men and those who function in the religious institutions and are the so-called custodians of Hindu dharma are mostly myopic; they are unable to distinguish between what constitutes "revealed knowledge" about Existence and Brahman and Creation, and temporal gender-caste based social modes of being. What prevents the government of India (which is also a signatory to CEDAW) from slapping legal cases against these religious institutions as they propound unconstitutional rhetoric that, in all respects, violates our Fundamental Rights that are embedded within the Indian Constitution?The larger question, though, is: can we ever take it for a given that what we know, in a definitive manner, as being central to the Hindu shastras can be construed as being infallible? - for all we know - these texts might have been amended and changes made as they were handed down generations. In the preface to his version of Manavadharma, Sir William Jones wrote about the textual variations that existed and how he collated different versions that were available in manuscript form to arrive at his final text. We can arrive at the obvious conclusion that William Jones consulted many textual variations of the Manusmriti, and if so, the implication is that there was no single authoritative text. If these texts that constitute our Hindu shastras are unreliable with numerous variants existing simultaneously, then it stands to reason that there is no authentic version that we can refer to as being the original. Who is to tell as to which part comprised "revealed knowledge" and which sections were subsequent add-ons?
트래킹 도착 조회
조회
조회 결과가 없는 경우, 센터로 상품이 도착하지 않은 것이니 판매처로 문의해주시기 바랍니다.
배송신청서에 이미 입고처리가 된 건이나 미작성 입고로 안내된 건은 조회가 되지 않습니다.