독일 일반 면세 구매대행
임시 중단 안내
안녕하세요. 오마이집입니다.
더 나은 서비스를 위해
독일 일반 면세 구매대행 서비스를 임시 중단합니다.
새로운 모습으로 빠른 시일 내 다시 인사드리겠습니다.
감사합니다.
US
DE
498 Centerpoint Blvd
[사서함번호]
New Castle, DE, 19720
302-322-8792
* 항공운송만 가능
US
CA
2601 Walnut Ave
[사서함번호]
Tustin, CA, 92780
714-676-7274
* 해상운송만 가능
China
山东省威海市 环翠区 苘山镇
福州路9号 顺丰速递北20米
[사서함번호]
264414
156-8451-3564
* 항공&해상운송 가능
Germany
WarpEx [사서함번호]
Carl-Benz Str. 35
Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Deutschland
60386
0614-2482-9236
* 항공운송만 가능
Korea
서울시 강서구 마곡중앙6로 11 보타닉파크타워3 405호
[사서함번호]
07801
070-5228-2983
Japan
福岡県 福岡市東区
和白東1丁目16-15 HANIRO
[사서함번호]
811-0214
092-608-7642
* 해상운송만 가능
고객센터 알림
NO | 안내시간 | 수취인명 | 신청서번호 | 알림내용 |
---|
* 알림 내용을 클릭하면 해당 페이지로 이동합니다.
Delaware
$55.95
책 정보
출판사 | Independently Published |
---|---|
저자 | Landmark Publications |
판형 | Paperback |
ISBN-13 | 9798570376953 |
발행일 | 2020/12/02 |
언어 | eng |
무게 (LB) | 1.58 |
주제 분류
책 소개
THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret and apply antitrust doctrine. Volume 2 of the casebook covers the Sixth through the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. * * * Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits "[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States." 15 U.S.C. § 1. The Supreme Court "has long recognized that, '[i]n view of the common law and the law in this country' when the Sherman Act was passed, the phrase 'restraint of trade' is best read to mean 'undue restraint.'" Am. Express, 138 S. Ct. at 2283 (alteration in original) (quoting Standard Oil Co. of N.J. v. United States, 221 U.S. 1, 59-60, 31 S.Ct. 502, 55 L.Ed. 619 (1911)); see also State Oil Co. v. Khan, 522 U.S. 3, 10, 118 S.Ct. 275, 139 L.Ed.2d 199 (1997) (noting that § 1 of the Sherman Act is understood "to outlaw only unreasonable restraints") (emphasis added) (citation omitted). Thus, p.989 "[t]o establish liability under § 1, a plaintiff must prove (1) the existence of an agreement, and (2) that the agreement was in unreasonable restraint of trade." Aerotec Int'l, Inc. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc., 836 F.3d 1171, 1178 (9th Cir. 2016) (emphasis added) (citing Am. Needle, Inc. v. Nat'l Football League, 560 U.S. 183, 189-90, 130 S.Ct. 2201, 176 L.Ed.2d 947 (2010))."Restraints that are not unreasonable per se are judged under the 'rule of reason.'" Am. Express, 138 S. Ct. at 2283 (quoting Business Elecs. Corp. v. Sharp Elecs. Corp., 485 U.S. 717, 723, 108 S.Ct. 1515, 99 L.Ed.2d 808 (1988)). "The rule of reason requires courts to conduct a fact-specific assessment of 'market power and market structure ... to assess the [restraint]'s actual effect' on competition." Id. (alterations in original) (emphasis added) (quoting Copperweld Corp. v. Indep. Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752, 768, 104 S.Ct. 2731, 81 L.Ed.2d 628 (1984)); see also In re Nat'l Football League's Sunday Ticket Antitrust Litig., 933 F.3d 1136, 1150 (9th Cir. 2019) ("Under this rule, we examine 'the facts peculiar to the business, the history of the restraint, and the reasons why it was imposed, ' to determine the effect on competition in the relevant product market." (quoting Nat'l Soc'y of Prof'l Eng'rs v. United States, 435 U.S. 679, 692, 98 S.Ct. 1355, 55 L.Ed.2d 637 (1978))). "The goal is to 'distinguis[h] between restraints with anticompetitive effect that are harmful to the consumer and restraints stimulating competition that are in the consumer's best interest.'" Am. Express, 138 S. Ct. at 2284 (alteration in original) (quoting Leegin Creative Leather Prods., 551 U.S. at 886, 127 S.Ct. 2705). FTC v. Qualcomm Inc., 969 F. 3d 974 (9th Cir. 2020)
트래킹 도착 조회
조회
조회 결과가 없는 경우, 센터로 상품이 도착하지 않은 것이니 판매처로 문의해주시기 바랍니다.
배송신청서에 이미 입고처리가 된 건이나 미작성 입고로 안내된 건은 조회가 되지 않습니다.