독일 일반 면세 구매대행
임시 중단 안내
안녕하세요. 오마이집입니다.
더 나은 서비스를 위해
독일 일반 면세 구매대행 서비스를 임시 중단합니다.
새로운 모습으로 빠른 시일 내 다시 인사드리겠습니다.
감사합니다.
US
DE
498 Centerpoint Blvd
[사서함번호]
New Castle, DE, 19720
302-322-8792
* 항공운송만 가능
US
CA
2601 Walnut Ave
[사서함번호]
Tustin, CA, 92780
714-676-7274
* 해상운송만 가능
China
山东省威海市 环翠区 苘山镇
福州路9号 顺丰速递北20米
[사서함번호]
264414
156-8451-3564
* 항공&해상운송 가능
Germany
WarpEx [사서함번호]
Carl-Benz Str. 35
Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Deutschland
60386
0614-2482-9236
* 항공운송만 가능
Korea
서울시 강서구 마곡중앙6로 11 보타닉파크타워3 405호
[사서함번호]
07801
070-5228-2983
Japan
福岡県 福岡市東区
和白東1丁目16-15 HANIRO
[사서함번호]
811-0214
092-608-7642
* 해상운송만 가능
고객센터 알림
NO | 안내시간 | 수취인명 | 신청서번호 | 알림내용 |
---|
* 알림 내용을 클릭하면 해당 페이지로 이동합니다.
Delaware
$55.95
책 정보
출판사 | Independently Published |
---|---|
저자 | Landmark Publications |
판형 | Paperback |
ISBN-13 | 9798566027791 |
발행일 | 2020/11/23 |
언어 | eng |
무게 (LB) | 1.58 |
주제 분류
책 소개
THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret and apply antitrust doctrine. Volume 1 of the casebook covers the District of Columbia Circuit and the First Circuit through the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. * * * Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits "[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States[.]" 15 U.S.C. § 1. The Supreme Court "has never taken a literal approach to [§ 1's] language. Rather the Court has repeated time and again that § 1 outlaw[s] only unreasonable restraints." Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc., v. PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877, 884, 127 S.Ct. 2705, 168 L.Ed.2d 623 (2007) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added). The general analytical approach, then, is to evaluate alleged violations of § 1 under the rule of reason. Id. That rule tells "the factfinder [to] weigh[] all of the circumstances of a case in deciding whether a restrictive practice should be prohibited as imposing an unreasonable restraint on competition." Id. at 885, 127 S.Ct. 2705. Circumstances to consider include information about the business, the restraint's history and effect, and the business's market power. Id. at 885-86, 127 S.Ct. 2705. * * * Although the rule of reason is the default mode of analysis, some practices so clearly violate § 1 that they are deemed unreasonable per se. "Restraints that are per se unlawful include horizontal agreements among competitors to fix prices[.]" Id. at 886, 127 S.Ct. 2705. "To p.727 justify a per se prohibition a restraint must have manifestly anticompetitive effects and lack any redeeming virtue." Id. (citations, internal quotation marks, and alteration omitted). Courts have "expressed reluctance to adopt per se rules with regard to restraints imposed in the context of business relationships where the economic impact of certain practices is not immediately obvious." Id. at 887, 127 S.Ct. 2705. Rather, "the per se rule is appropriate only after courts have had considerable experience with the type of restraint at issue, and only if courts can predict with confidence that it would be invalidated in all or almost all instances under the rule of reason[.]" Id. at 886-87, 127 S.Ct. 2705 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). In Re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, 962 F. 3d 719 (3rd Cir. 2020)
트래킹 도착 조회
조회
조회 결과가 없는 경우, 센터로 상품이 도착하지 않은 것이니 판매처로 문의해주시기 바랍니다.
배송신청서에 이미 입고처리가 된 건이나 미작성 입고로 안내된 건은 조회가 되지 않습니다.